(no subject)
Aug. 16th, 2013 09:17 pm"Blue laws" - often said to have acquired that name as they were printed on blue paper, although there is no evidence of this - had been engrained in American society since the Puritans first established societies there.
A 1695 colonial New York blue law read, "Be it therefore enacted that there shall be no traveling, servile laboring and working, shooting, fishing, sporting, playing, horseracing, hunting, or frequenting of tippling houses, or the use of any other unlawful exercises or pastimes, by the inhabitants or sojourners within this province, or by any of their slaves or servants, on the Lord's day." The punishment for any of these offenses was a fine of six shillings or three hours in the stocks.
In New York, regulations againt Sunday activities continued into the next centuries, as upstate (largely Protestant) Republican lawmakers supported laws that did not make sense for the Jewish and Catholic residents of New York City. By the 1890s, there was a long tradition in the New York legislature of enacting legislation to enforce morality in the city.
"Nothing has so seriously caused us to reject our religion as the Christian policy of adopting a different sabbath, the force of example at least, would carry Jews to the Synagogue, when Christians mass to the Churches, nay there would not be the same clashing of interests, nor a day of labour lost." -Joseph Marx
1833, South Carolina
Alexander Marks was prosecuted by the town council of Columbia, S.C. for having kept their doors open on Sunday, thus violating a local statute which regulated Sunday observance. Marks contended that this statute conflicted with the United States Constitution, which guaranteed the free exercise of conscience to all, and that, being a Jew, this local ordinance was unconstitutional. The court, however, did not adopt this view of the situation and upheld Marks' conviction on the ground that the ordinance and upheld Marks' conviction on the ground that the ordinance in question was proper, for the good of society and in aid of law and order, not of religion.
1845, Hamilton County, Ohio
The court let off some Jews who had been fined for doing business on Sunday.
1849 - Virginia amended its laws and granted shomrei Shabbos Jews the right to open thier businesses on Sunday. "We rejoice at this elightened legislation, not that we wish the Jews to open their shops in large Christian communities, and invite persons to come and deal with them in violation of their principles; but wish them to be at liberty to act at their pleasure, to open or close their places of business as they may see fit." --> essentially setting them apart from the mainstream American society, lauding the great Constitution that would grant religious freedom to them too, but still hoping to keep them apart
Reform Rabbis such as Samuel Hirsh advocated for changing the Jewish sabbath to Sunday to integrate more fully, although even among reformers this was seen as too extreme. Rabbi Bernard Drachman, leader of the Union of Orthodox Rabbis, advocated that Jewish laborers be afforded the opportunity to keep Shabbat on Saturday and that they close on Saturday and open on Sunday. Non-Jews opposed this as they argued that it would create an unfair advantage for Jewish businessmen.
Between 1880 and 1890, the Jewish population of New York jumped from 80,000 to nearly 600,000. This coincided with a religious revival of Protestants who believed it was time to create a Christian state (incidentally, the same idea of American exceptionalism that would contribute to the mass exodus to Columbia XD). A penal code with stringent Sunday amendments passed in 1881; Jewish peddlers paid protection money to policemen.
In terms of Lawrence, the dock workers and longshoremen of New York were always very much a multiethnic group (I particularly associate the job with Italian Americans, but I think that's mostly Arthur Miller's influence XD). I think that in this case there would be a small group of Jewish workers who agreed with each each other to walk out of work on the next Saturday and strike until their demands for the Sabbath were met. I can see Lawrence's father's involvement with the Knights of Labor potentially helping out in terms of providing financial support to the workers' families while they were striking, although I don't see this group helping out in a big way i.e. getting Christian workers to strike on their behalf too. I do see it as promoting a lot of awareness about workers' rights and unionization among the dock workers at large, though, which is one of the biggest things to come out of this case.
But yeah I see the striking workers being arrested maybe for being on the premises and advocating to other Jews to join the strike or something and getting arrested for trespass (this is one part I'm shaky on, I think we could come up with something cooler - I like the idea of them being arrested for actually doing work on the Sunday but I'm trying to figure out how to work that in), and Lawrence takes the case possibly through hearing about it from his father, and basically argues that America is a land of freedom of religion rather than it being founded on these Christian tenets, and the judge agrees but says that they have the right to do so in their own community and that a Christian employer doesn't have to employ people who won't work the days they want them to, so they're fired from their jobs there anyway. XD
References (and a lot of pasting in the first part of this) from:
Jews and the Sunday Laws
Fascinating Jewish History: Sunday Rest Laws
NYC's Blue Laws
Shabbat as Social Reform
A 1695 colonial New York blue law read, "Be it therefore enacted that there shall be no traveling, servile laboring and working, shooting, fishing, sporting, playing, horseracing, hunting, or frequenting of tippling houses, or the use of any other unlawful exercises or pastimes, by the inhabitants or sojourners within this province, or by any of their slaves or servants, on the Lord's day." The punishment for any of these offenses was a fine of six shillings or three hours in the stocks.
In New York, regulations againt Sunday activities continued into the next centuries, as upstate (largely Protestant) Republican lawmakers supported laws that did not make sense for the Jewish and Catholic residents of New York City. By the 1890s, there was a long tradition in the New York legislature of enacting legislation to enforce morality in the city.
"Nothing has so seriously caused us to reject our religion as the Christian policy of adopting a different sabbath, the force of example at least, would carry Jews to the Synagogue, when Christians mass to the Churches, nay there would not be the same clashing of interests, nor a day of labour lost." -Joseph Marx
1833, South Carolina
Alexander Marks was prosecuted by the town council of Columbia, S.C. for having kept their doors open on Sunday, thus violating a local statute which regulated Sunday observance. Marks contended that this statute conflicted with the United States Constitution, which guaranteed the free exercise of conscience to all, and that, being a Jew, this local ordinance was unconstitutional. The court, however, did not adopt this view of the situation and upheld Marks' conviction on the ground that the ordinance and upheld Marks' conviction on the ground that the ordinance in question was proper, for the good of society and in aid of law and order, not of religion.
1845, Hamilton County, Ohio
The court let off some Jews who had been fined for doing business on Sunday.
1849 - Virginia amended its laws and granted shomrei Shabbos Jews the right to open thier businesses on Sunday. "We rejoice at this elightened legislation, not that we wish the Jews to open their shops in large Christian communities, and invite persons to come and deal with them in violation of their principles; but wish them to be at liberty to act at their pleasure, to open or close their places of business as they may see fit." --> essentially setting them apart from the mainstream American society, lauding the great Constitution that would grant religious freedom to them too, but still hoping to keep them apart
Reform Rabbis such as Samuel Hirsh advocated for changing the Jewish sabbath to Sunday to integrate more fully, although even among reformers this was seen as too extreme. Rabbi Bernard Drachman, leader of the Union of Orthodox Rabbis, advocated that Jewish laborers be afforded the opportunity to keep Shabbat on Saturday and that they close on Saturday and open on Sunday. Non-Jews opposed this as they argued that it would create an unfair advantage for Jewish businessmen.
Between 1880 and 1890, the Jewish population of New York jumped from 80,000 to nearly 600,000. This coincided with a religious revival of Protestants who believed it was time to create a Christian state (incidentally, the same idea of American exceptionalism that would contribute to the mass exodus to Columbia XD). A penal code with stringent Sunday amendments passed in 1881; Jewish peddlers paid protection money to policemen.
In terms of Lawrence, the dock workers and longshoremen of New York were always very much a multiethnic group (I particularly associate the job with Italian Americans, but I think that's mostly Arthur Miller's influence XD). I think that in this case there would be a small group of Jewish workers who agreed with each each other to walk out of work on the next Saturday and strike until their demands for the Sabbath were met. I can see Lawrence's father's involvement with the Knights of Labor potentially helping out in terms of providing financial support to the workers' families while they were striking, although I don't see this group helping out in a big way i.e. getting Christian workers to strike on their behalf too. I do see it as promoting a lot of awareness about workers' rights and unionization among the dock workers at large, though, which is one of the biggest things to come out of this case.
But yeah I see the striking workers being arrested maybe for being on the premises and advocating to other Jews to join the strike or something and getting arrested for trespass (this is one part I'm shaky on, I think we could come up with something cooler - I like the idea of them being arrested for actually doing work on the Sunday but I'm trying to figure out how to work that in), and Lawrence takes the case possibly through hearing about it from his father, and basically argues that America is a land of freedom of religion rather than it being founded on these Christian tenets, and the judge agrees but says that they have the right to do so in their own community and that a Christian employer doesn't have to employ people who won't work the days they want them to, so they're fired from their jobs there anyway. XD
References (and a lot of pasting in the first part of this) from:
Jews and the Sunday Laws
Fascinating Jewish History: Sunday Rest Laws
NYC's Blue Laws
Shabbat as Social Reform